Public Records Office / Public Library
Research register
James: an incapacity ruling could not end the case that way
District court dismissed a pro se complaint with prejudice solely because the plaintiff had been adjudicated incapacitated in state court in 2003 and her guardians did not respond; her filings alleged a guardian held a financial interest adverse to hers; the Second…
Read each occurrence in context. Evidence labels below are the labels recorded by the source edition; importing a row does not independently verify it.
What the record says
Worldwide register by region (Batch 2) · Batch 16
- Jurisdiction / date
- US, 2d Cir. 2011
- Channel
- 1-reverse
- Mechanism
- Post-detention discounting (Mechanism 8)
- What is documented
- District court dismissed a pro se complaint with prejudice solely because the plaintiff had been adjudicated incapacitated in state court in 2003 and her guardians did not respond; her filings alleged a guardian held a financial interest adverse to hers; the Second Circuit vacated
- Finding or status
- JUDICIAL FINDING, REVERSED (James v. State of New York)
- Label
- VERIFIED; shows the guardianship record operating as a bar to the courthouse, with the person's own allegation against the guardian unheard
Linked patterns
No pattern link assigned yet.
Linked corrections
No separately indexed correction linked to this key. Review the source wording and later batches before relying on an earlier assertion.
Reference and provenance
2011-US-2D-CIR-JAMES